- Company Penalized For Failing to Provide Rest Breaks
- New Set of Regulations Standardizes Jury Selection in Civil Courts
- United States Supreme Court Construes Section 1981 as Applicable to Retaliation Cases
- Scope of Discovery Limited for Sued Legal Counsel
- Racial, Sexual, Gender Discrimination Present In Major Sports Corporations
- Age Discrimination Joins Racial Discrimination, Gender Bias as Issues in 2008 Election
- Supreme Court Ruling Favors Employees in Age Discrimination Suits
- Federal Bill Tackles Genetic Information Discrimination
- Pro Se Suit Follows Dropped Criminal Charges
- Unemployment Reaches Major Law Firms
- Balancing Act Between Religious Policy and Administration Appears Before Florida Supreme Court
- Second Failed Libel Case for Terminated Employee
- Bench Trial Gamble Pays Off
- The Pregnancy Discrimination Act and Abortion
- Pregnant Employees Among the Most Vulnerable to Discrimination
- Broad Protection for Employees Against Retaliation
- "Harry Potter" and Religious Discrimination
- Supreme Court Issues Major Decision on Retaliation
- Age Related Issues Are Everywhere
- Another Case of Gender Discrimination in Financial Services
- The Rights of Workers in the Workplace
- Racially Insensitive Emails Revealed at Government Agency
- Jurors May Be Permitted to Pose Questions During Trial
- Differences in Post-Law School Debt Among Genders and Races
- Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
- Gender Discrimination on Wall Street
- New Anti-Discrimination Measure Based on Genes Passes in Congress
- Issue of Burden of Proof in Age Discrimination Suits Reaches the United States Supreme Court
- Republican Senators Block Pay Discrimination Measure
- Banner Year in Store for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- The Restoration Act and New York City Human Rights Law
- A Retaliation Claim May Still Prevail Where the Underlying Discrimination May Not
- Reductions in Force May, in Some Instances, Be Discriminatory
- Scope of Retaliation Expanded to Protect Plaintiff's "Associates"
- Important Issues of Note in a Reduction in Force (RIF)
- Another Significant Decision on Punitive Damages
- NEW YORK CITY'S RESTORATION ACT IS SIGNIFICANT IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES
- RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE
- Title VII Race Discrimination Claims Apply to Discriminatory Conduct Based on an Employees Association with a Person of Another Race
- Employment Class Action Suits On The Rise
- EEOC REPORTS AN INCREASE IN CLAIMS OF PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION
- COURT HOLDS THAT THE NEW YORK CITY HUMAN RIGHTS LAW PROTECTS TRANSGENDER PERSONS
- COURT HOLDS THAT NON-RACIAL COMMENTS SUPPORT AN EMPLOYEE’S CLAIM OF RACE DISCRIMINATION
- COUNTERCLAIMS FILED AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE WHO FILED A LAWSUIT QUALIFIES AS ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION IN A RETALIATION CASE
- JOB DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS ARE ON THE RISE
- SCHWARTZ & PERRY SERVE AS JUDGES IN A MOOT COURT COMPETITION DEALING WITH TRANSGENDER DISCRIMINATION
- SUMMARY JUDGMENT VICTORY FOR MUSLIM PLAINTIFF IN RACE DISCRIMINATION CASE
- NEW YORK CITY SETTLES RACE DISCRIMINATION CLASS-ACTION SUIT
- SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES THE DEFINITION OF A FILING “CHARGE” WITH THE EEOC
- SUPREME COURT ALLOWS WORKERS TO SUE OVER LOSSES TO 401(k) PLANS
- SUPREME COURT TO HEAR CASE OF COMPELLED ARBITRATION OF DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS
- SUPREME COURT FINDS FLEXIBLE STANDARD IN EVALUATING EVIDENCE IN DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS
- MORE EMPLOYMENT LAW CASES FOR THE SUPREME COURT THIS TERM
- STATE SENATE EMPLOYEE’S RACE DISCRIMINATION CLAIM IS PERMITTED TO GO FORWARD
- CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE MAY FORM THE BASIS OF A VIABLE DISCRIMINATION CLAIM
- SUPREME COURT VERY ACTIVE IN HEARING EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES
- NO SMOKING GUN NEEDED TO ESTABLISH DISCRIMINATION
- AGE RELATED DISCRIMINATION IS AGAINST THE LAW
- LOCKHEED SETTLES RACIAL-DISCRIMINATION SUIT
- TARGET RACIAL DISCRIMINATION SUIT SETTLED
- SEXUAL HARASSMENT SUIT SETTLEMENT AND MADISON SQUARE GARDEN
- GENDER DISCRIMINATION TRIAL CONCLUDES WITH AWARD FOR THE PLAINTIFF
- AGE DISCRIMINATION CASE ARGUMENTS MADE IN THE SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK
- HOW A SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIM CAN ARISE WHILE AT WORK ABROAD: “WHEN IN ROME...?”
- EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAWS ARE MOST PROGRESSIVE IN NEW YORK CITY